T_X<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://chaos.social/@Natanox" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>Natanox</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://chaos.social/@librecast" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>librecast</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://respublicae.eu/@EU_Commission" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>EU_Commission</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://chaos.social/@dentangle" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>dentangle</span></a></span> on the other hand I think it would be great if public broadcasting institutes in the EU were deciding to move to <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/IPv6" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>IPv6</span></a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/multicast" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>multicast</span></a> in the long run, not DVB-T. Maybe even mixed with public, open IPv6 capable <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/MeshNetworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MeshNetworks</span></a> (similar to <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/Freifunk" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Freifunk</span></a> for instance). And tackling any technical issues along the way.<br>So that eventually we'd have a robust, decentral, bidirectional communication infrastructure at affordable costs. 2/2</p>