det.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mastodon Server des Unterhaltungsfernsehen Ehrenfeld zum dezentralen Diskurs.

Administered by:

Server stats:

2.1K
active users

#semitism

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

I am coming back to the subject of the #Australian GO8 universities definition of #antiSemetism because the controversy is an itch I feel compelled to scratch. It follows my reading of an article published by The #Conversation (whose authors’ biases are duly noted in the margin) which highlights the weaknesses of our language when it is used to define and pin down the meaning of a word describing ‘others’. This weakness is mostly evidenced when emotions are at play, and there are few subject matters where emotions rules our head more than when we talk about ‘others’.

As the authors explain, “[the] Controversy has centred on where the definition moves to conflate antizionism and antisemitism. Some scholars and activists believe it mutes legitimate discussion about Israeli state violence towards Palestinians.

The competing Jerusalem Declaration was subsequently endorsed by around 370 leading scholars of Holocaust history, Jewish studies, Antisemitism studies, and Middle East studies. It defines antisemitism as “prejudice, discrimination, hostility or violence against Jews as Jews”. Its authors claim the declaration aims “to protect a space for an open debate about the vexed question of the future of Israel/Palestine”.

I have to say that the latter (The Jerusalem Declaration) is the better and more workable definition in a context where policies and actions of the #UltraNationalist #Netanyahu govt can rightly be condemned and criticised without expressing anti-semitic sentiments. Most, if not all, other definitions would favour one extremist ideological perspective over another.

Source: theconversation.com/a-new-defi

Just as we know and understand that a fascist State (Russia) misuses the term #fascism as a false flag to legitimise its invasion of a neighbour’s (Ukraine) internationally recognised territory, we should also recognise that the terms anti- #Zionism and anti- #Semitism are conflated by ultra nationalists in the State of Israel and those who support their expansionist and racist ideologies.

For the record, I support a two state solution even if I cannot see how we get there given past and present circumstances. Perhaps the toppling of the Netanyahu’s govt is a small step along that road. And my saying this should in no way be construed as expressing anti-semitism.

As this example shows, definitions of Semitism need not exclusively describe the Jewish people which is a recent (late C19th) trend.
Semitism: “Cultural characteristics attribute to the semetic people.” (Source: EOD)
“Semitic people or Semites is a term for an ethnic, cultural or racial group associated with people of the Middle East, including Arabs, Jews, Akkadians, and Phoenicians. The terminology is now largely unused outside the grouping "Semitic languages" in linguistics.” (Source: Wikipedia)

This broader meaning only serves to confuses contemporary discussions at large (trust our media outlets to confuse us all further for clearly political reasons).

The ConversationA new definition of antisemitism from Universities Australia is attracting criticism – two historians explain whyAt the core of the ongoing debate over definitions are genuinely different understandings of what constitutes antisemitism.
Continued thread

I personally am particularly interested in the unambiguous defintion of antisemitism - please vote in infosec.exchange/@ErikvanStrat .

My reason for addressing this is that I have been called an antisemite in at least two occasions:

1) I disagreed with a Jew who stated that throwing a brick through a window of another American Jew, who had put a sign on their lawn stating "I stand with Israel", is an act of antisemitism (infosec.exchange/@0xamit/11214 ); in my dictionary that is an act of antizionism.

As a result, eventually my account was silenced (which I successfully appealed to - a big thank you to the infosec.exchange mods for restoring my account!)

2) On March 10, pres. Herzog of Israel was invited to the opening of a new Holocaust museum in Amsterdam. I was protesting (amidst Jewish people) outside the synagoge where Herzog spoke. I was carrying a sign that read:

My grandpa was a Jew. And now
Gaza is a concentration camp

I was there because Herzog was allowed to tell his audience that Isreal is "defending western values" by wiping out an entire population - pure propaganda that has absolutely nothing to do with the WW2 Holocaust, and effectively impairs or even denies its horror and insults its victims and survivors.

Notably in Anne Frank's country, each genocide-protestor is now called an antisemite by nearly all of our political parties (in Dutch): christenunie.nl/nl/blog/2024/0 (archive: web.archive.org/web/2024032708).

IMHO, an unambiguous definition of antisemitism is fundamental to help stop the Gaza genocide.

PS: existing definitions are too vague or completely ambiguous, such as:

1) "Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities." (with mutually conflicting and/or deliberately misinterpreted examples, taken from holocaustremembrance.com/resou);

2) "Antisemitism is prejudice against or hatred of Jews." (from ushmm.org/antisemitism/what-is).

#DefinitionOfAntisemitism
#antisemitism
#Semitism
#Zionism
#antiZionism
#Gaza
#GazaGenocide
#Warcrimes
#CrimesAgainstHumanity
#CrimesAgainstChildren
#Herzog
#Holocaust
#HolocaustDenial

Infosec ExchangeErik van Straten (@ErikvanStraten@infosec.exchange)Please boost! Antisemitism manifests itself via rethorical and/or physical violence towards: [ ] Any Jew, purely based on prejudice [ ] Specific Jews, for specific reasons, such as openly expressed opinions [ ] Both (please explain in a comment)
Replied in thread

@hovav wrote: {
Erik, I'm sorry, did you just type, "And it is this thing that Jewish people do that justifies hating them"?
}

I did not write that. In fact, I wrote the exact opposite; throwing stones does not help either, and Zionism is not Semitism.

If *some* non-Israeli Jews suggest that, even in their "least intrusive thinkable way", they condone that Israel kills and starves innocent children in Gaza (*), then I think that it is *expected behavior* (which I do not and will never justify) that other idiots will start throwing stones.

(*) I know you just started typing "Hamas is to blame". I'd like to remind you that there's a high fence around Gaza and that Hamas cannot influence food, water and medecine supplies *even if they wanted to* because approximately nothing goes through the fence (apart from the fact that they're hiding trying to save their lives).

Unfortunately, the matter of the fact is that extreme hatred between two groups of people often escalates into dragging innocent people from outside of any group *into* such a group.

For example, if enough people like @0xamit deliberately confuse #antiSemitism with #antiZionism, idiots will start throwing stones at *ALL* Jews. He just asked for it. It is called fake news, by distorting facts.

Possibly it would help if people with signs would write below their text: "Speaking for myself, not for *ALL* Jews".

Unfortunately that is exactly what they, and @0xamit, *do not* want anyone to think - because if *ALL Jews* would condone the genocide that Israel commits, "that would justify it".

And, for similar reasons, you were deliberately misquoting me.

Hate bounces back - *AND* to innocent people - who *YOU*, against their will, drag into *YOUR* belief.

Ed Balls accidentally admits to Labour's weaponisation of anti-Semitism

Former #Labour MP Ed Balls, the world’s most unbearably smug centrist, has just admitted to something we’ve (Council Estate Media) been saying for years: that Sir Keir #Starmer’s purge of alleged anti-Semites has nothing to do with #AntiSemitism. It is factionalism and he uses anti-#Semitism as his cover.

#Zionism #AntiZionism #LabourParty

councilestatemedia.uk/p/ed-bal

Council Estate Media · Ed Balls accidentally admits to Labour's weaponisation of anti-SemitismBy Ricky